Tapered Screw-Vent® Implant Family
Tapered Screw-Vent® Implants

Documented Clinical Outcomes:

Cumulative clinical survival rates for 1,553 Tapered Screw-Vent MTX® Implants:1-14

  • Implant survival rate mean 98.7% (range from 95.1% to 100%)
  • Follow-up times range from 3 to 120 months (mean = 36.4 months)

Clinical Flexibility: Each of the TSVTM Implant’s crestal configurations is designed for crestal bone and tissue maintenance.

Designed for Primary Stability: Primary stability achieved by using Tapered Screw-Vent Implants enables immediate placement and/or immediate loading in appropriately selected patients.13,15-18

  • The proprietary internal hex connection, utilized with Zimmer Dental’s friction-fit abutments, has been documented to shield crestal bone from concentrated occlusal forces.19,20

Proprietary Platform PlusTM Technology:

  • Zimmer’s proprietary friction-fit internal hex connection is a unique combination of designs that has been shown to create favorable conditions for bone level maintenance.7-8

 

SHOP ONLINE
Educational
Opportunities
Request
More Information
Tapered Screw-Vent® Implants Related Products
  • Brochures
  • Clinical Summaries
  • Manuals

4860 - Tapered Screw-Vent Implant System Catalog

4924 - Internal Hex with Friction-Fit Brochure (Rock-solid Fit)

ZD1701 - TSV MP-1 HA Implants Data Sheet

ZB0046 - Tapered-Screw Vent Family Brochure

ZD1297 - Zimmer MP-1 HA Technology Brochure

5161 - Tapered Screw-Vent Implant System Manual

ZB0105 -  Zimmer Biomet Instrument Kit System Reference Guide

1295 - Zimmer Surgical Options Guide

  1. 1. Shiigai T. Pilot study in the identification of stability values for determining immediate and early loading of Implants. J Oral Implantol. 2007;33:13-22.
  2. 2. Park SH, Lee KW, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Shotwell J, Wang HL. Effect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:32-41.
  3. 3. Steigmann M, Wang HL. Esthetic buccal flap for correction of buccal fenestration defects during flapless immediate implant surgery. J Periodontol. 2006;77:517-522.
  4. 4. Lee CYS. Immediate load protocol for anterior maxilla with cortical bone from mandibular ramus. Implant Dent. 2006;15:153-159.
  5. 5. Cannizzaro G, Felice P, Leone M, Viola P, Esposito M. Early loading of implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: lateral sinus lift with autogenous bone and Bio-Oss versus crestal mini sinus lift and 8-mm hydroxyapatite-coated implants. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2009;2:25-38.
  6. 6. Siddiqui AA, O’Neal R, Nummikoski P, Pituch D, Ochs M, Huber H, Chung W, Phillips K, Wang IC. Immediate loading of single-tooth restorations: one-year prospective results. J Oral Implantol. 2008;34:208-218.
  7. 7. Ormianer Z, Schiroli G. Maxillary single-tooth replacement utilizing a novel ceramic restorative system: results to 30 months. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32:190-199.
  8. 8. Artzi Z, Parsori A, Nemcovsky CE. Wide-diameter implant placement and internal sinus membrane elevation in the immediate post extraction phase: clinical and radiographic observations in 12 consecutive molar sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:242-249.
  9. 9. Khayat PG, Milliez SN. Prospective clinical evaluation of 835 multithreaded Tapered Screw-Vent implants: results after two years of functional loading. J Oral Implantol. 2007;34:225-231.
  10. 10. Ormianer Z, Garg AK, Palti A. Immediate loading of implant overdentures using modified loading protocol. Implant Dent. 2006;15:35-40.
  11. 11. Lee CYS, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS. Immediate loading of the grafted maxillary sinus using platelet rich plasma and autogenous bone: a preliminary study with histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Implant Dent. 2008;17:59-73.
  12. 12. Lee CYS, Hasegawa H. Immediate load and esthetic zone considerations to replace maxillary incisor teeth using a new zirconia implant abutment in the bone grafted anterior maxilla. J Oral Implantol. 2008;34:259-267
  13. 13. Ormianer Z, Palti A. Long-term clinical evaluation of tapered multi-threaded implants: results and influences of potential risk factors. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32:300-307.
  14. 14. Data on file with Zimmer Dental Inc.
  15. 15. Binon PP. The evolution and evaluation of two interference-fit implant interfaces. Postgraduate Dent. 1996;3:3-13.
  16. 16. Siddiqui AA, O’Neal R, Nummikoski P, Pituch D, Ochs M, Huber H, Chung W, Phillips K, Wang IC. Immediate loading of single-tooth restorations: one-year prospective results. J Oral Implantol. 2008;34:208-218.
  17. 17. Shiigai T. Pilot study in the identifi cation of stability values for determining immediate and early loading of Implants. J Oral Implantol. 2007;33:13-22.
  18. 18. Rosenlicht JL. Advancements in soft bone implant stability. West Indian Dent J. 2002;6:2-7.
  19. 19. Mihalko WM, May TC, Kay JF, Krause WP. Finite element analysis of interface geometry effects on the crestal bone surrounding a dental implant. Implant Dent. 1992;1:212-217.
  20. 20. Chun HJ, Shin HS, Han CH, Lee SH. Infl uence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21:105-202.

All references to Zimmer Biomet Dental contained herein refer to the dental subsidiaries of Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. Unless otherwise indicated, as referenced herein, all trademarks are the property of Zimmer Biomet; and all products are manufactured, distributed and marketed by Zimmer Biomet Dental (and, in the case of distribution and marketing, its authorized marketing partners). Please note that not all products are available and registered in every country/region. Please check with a Zimmer Biomet Dental representative for product availability and additional information. Zimmer Dental products and Biomet 3i products may not be cross-compatible. Please refer to individual product labeling for compatibility information.